#Rmarkdown github readme install#
#Rmarkdown github readme archive#
#Rmarkdown github readme full#

Link = paste0('', link) # create full URL Publish_date = ymd(date), # convert to date class N = nrow(.):1, # number starting from first post Str_replace_all('', '') # remove newline/space Html_nodes('.archive-item-date') %>% # extract date nodes only Html_attr('href') # extract href attribute Html_nodes('.archive-item-link') %>% # extract title node

#Rmarkdown github readme archive#

There’s some R code there that uses to scrape the archive page of the blog and create a dataframe of the titles, links and publish dates of each post. The real magic is in some R code chunks at the top of the README.Rmd file itself. Git push origin || echo 'No changes to commit'īasically, the action knits the repo’s README.Rmd (R Markdown format containing R code) to a counterpart README.md (GitHub-flavoured markdown), which is displayed when you visit the repo. Git commit README.md README_files/ -m 'Re-build README.Rmd' || echo 'No changes to commit'

Git config -local user.email config -local user.name 'GitHub Actions' Run: Rscript -e 'rmarkdown::render('README.Rmd')' Run: Rscript -e 'remotes::install_github('hadley/emo')' Run: Rscript -e 'install.packages(c('remotes', 'rmarkdown', 'knitr', 'tidyverse'))'

#Rmarkdown github readme install#

uses: uses: uses: name: Install CRAN packages I’ve modified r-lib’s pre-written YAML for this, which can be generated in the correct location in your project with usethis::use_github_action('render-rmarkdown.yaml'). The YAML file for it reads like ‘at the specified time 2, set up a remote environment with R and some dependencies, then render the R Markdown file and push the changes to GitHub.’ I ended up being more comprehensive than just this singular suggestion, which came to be more in-line with this StackOverflow question.I’ve scheduled a GitHub Action for the early hours of each day. This post was originally inspired by this tweet from nice! FYI if you upload those readme images in a new GitHub comment and it'll give you the image paths back to put them in your readme, then you won't have them cluttering the repo 😶- Dave 🧱 January 18, 2021 It's possible GitHub changes these URLs without notifying you.

The purpose of images in comments is technically to serve the comment.

all your images go into a single 'Images' issue that stays open. Maybe that's not a big deal, or maybe you have a way to streamline it - e.g.

On its own, it becomes difficult to know the source of the image.Unlike the other two options, I see two issues with this approach:

Wait for the file to upload and then the URL to the image is right there! You don't even have to submit the issue if you don't want to (although that may limit the image's lifespan). You can drag and drop the image from your computer to a comment field in GitHub. The trick is to add them to some comment - an issue, pull request or discussion - and then grab the resulting URL. This one is a little goofy, but it totally works! Lastly, you could use GitHub to host the image for you. In this case, you could get the direct and full URL to the image and then use that. Method #2: Remote FileĪnother option is to use some external file hosting service to provide your image, such as S3 or Dropbox. If you end up using a lot of images, I'd consider another route. This approach is a quick and easy option, as long as you don't have too many images to manage. Now, let's say that you have another README file in your src directory, but your image is still in the images directory. Then your code in the project's main README file would look like this: Let's say the image file was instead in an images directory. In other words, if you place an image file in the root your project as my-image.jpg, you could then render the image in your projects main README.md file like this ( title omitted for simplicity): When you do that, you can use a path to that file for the src, which should be relative from the markdown file. The first method is to commit the image directly to your GitHub repository. For example, if you want to control the size or alignment of the image, you might do something like this: Method #1: Local File This is a great option if you want to add a little custom styling to your image. That means you could also render an the image above like this: HTML code is also valid within most markdown renderers, including GitHub's flavor. The original documentation specifies that images should be written like so: !( /posts/path/to/img.jpg 'Optional title') Here are three methods for adding images to markdown files in a GitHub repository. While there is a standard way to add an image in markdown, the nuance is in the image's source. Images can be a great way to enhance your documentation in README files or other markdown documentation.